Showing posts with label Essay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Essay. Show all posts

Saturday, May 20, 2023

We're No. 10??


After years of commenting that the Austin skyline seemed to be changing daily, you’d think I’d have been prepared for this. Nope. Not at all. The news that Austin is now the 10th largest city in the country really blew my mind.

A stats junkie, I just wasn’t paying attention to the stats. I knew Austin was somewhere in the mid-teens. But I somehow missed that we’d been parked at No. 11 for at least the past three years. So when the Census Bureau reported last week that we’d blown past San Jose into 10th place, it caught me so off guard I had to dig into the numbers, some. 

Here we go. Let’s take it census by census, starting in 1970. 

Fifty years ago, Austin was a city of a quarter-million people; it ranked 56th in the country. It was about the size of modern-day Irving or Laredo. But it was on a growth spurt, having swollen by about a third since the 1960 count. 

By 1980, the year before Linda and I moved here, the decennial growth rate had surged to 37%. Austin was now home to 345,000 or so and was 42nd in the country. The city was about as big as Anaheim is today. 

Growth “slowed” to less than 3% per year in the 80s thanks to our oil-price roller coaster ride. All over Texas it slowed but certainly didn’t stop – and certainly not in Austin. We reached the end of the decade living in a city a little smaller than Omaha is now. At 465,000, Austin had become the country’s 27th largest city. We’d leapfrogged places like Miami, Atlanta, Portland, and St. Louis. And Austin had passed Fort Worth and was now the fifth largest city in the state. 

In the roaring 90s, we roared past Denver, Boston, Seattle, and New Orleans into 16th place – and passed El Paso into the No. 4 slot among Texas cities. With 650,000 people, Austin at the turn of the millennium was about the size of modern-day Las Vegas. 

And for the next decade, the pace really did decline to about 2% a year. But Austin had already become so big, even at that pace we added about 130,000 residents, passed Detroit and Columbus, and become the 14th biggest city in the U.S. With almost 800,000 living here in 2010, we were as big as San Francisco is today. 

Despite all the cranes that loomed over downtown over the ensuing 12 years, despite all the jokes about newly arrived Californians, despite all the tied-up traffic, the 2010-size Austin stuck in my mind. I somehow missed that we were passing Jacksonville, Frisco, and Indianapolis on our way to 11th place in the 2020 census. That decade-plus-long brain fart is to blame, then, for my surprise at the bureau’s 2022 numbers estimating the Austin population at 974,447 – big enough to jump over the declining San Jose and into the Top 10. 

So now, four of the country’s 10 biggest cities are Texas cities. No other state but California has more than one. It looks like we’re here to stay. Houston (4th), San Antonio (7th), and Dallas (9th) are more likely to climb over the crumbling old cities ahead of them than to lose rank any time soon. 

That all adds a little bit of polish on the ever-humble Texas ego until you realize that every new Texans gives incrementally more national influence to the right-wing crackpots that run our state – and to draw ridiculous political maps that sap the power of our growing – and much more progressive – big cities. 

So that explains it. I wasn’t blind to my city’s standing. It was just a case of hopeful ignorance.

Photo by Carlos Alfonso on Unsplash










Sunday, August 21, 2022

The Dead Cemetery

Cemeteries are generally sad places. Dead cemeteries even more so. The sorrow that pervades them seems a commentary on the living, not the dead.

I visited a dead cemetery recently. Even in its glory years, if it had them, it wasn’t much. A half-acre or so. All the gravestones flat on the ground – no monuments, no ivy, no shrubs, no flowers. Small American flags marking the plots of veterans who lay there its only adornment. Only a few small stones left by recent visitors.

The cemetery in question had been established by the congregation of the small Jewish temple where I grew up. The congregation is no more. Their cemetery is dead.


Some people are cemetery people. Some aren’t. I’m not a cemetery person. I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of times I’ve been to this one: my dad’s funeral in 2004, the unveiling of his gravestone a few months later, my mom’s funeral in 2015, and her unveiling. My dad wasn’t a cemetery person either. Although both of his parents were buried in a slightly less dead graveyard a few miles from this one, I don’t recall ever going there with him.

My mom, though – mom was definitely a cemetery person. Several times each year – usually on a Sunday when dad was playing golf – mom and I would cross the state line to the big (or, at least, bigger) city cemetery where her father lay. I never knew my grandpa. He died about five years before I was born. My dad used to say that mom had worshipped him. I got that.

During our visits, we would plant fresh flowers and trim the bushes by his headstone and the ivy that covered the ground above grandpa and his casket. Judging from the number of spigots that sprouted around this cemetery, plenty of mourners did the same. The pipes grew out of the ground just high enough to allow a watering can to sit beneath them.

Then mom would talk to grandpa for a while, say a little prayer, and adjust the greenery a bit more, and we’d head home.


There was another, more pragmatic reason I didn’t visit my parents’ graves more frequently. My family and I live about 1,400 miles away these days. Trips “up home” have typically been short and hectic. I simply didn’t have time for a low priority activity.

This visit, amid the COVID-19 pandemic and mass remote working, was different. We went for three weeks, mostly to spend time with my mother-in-law and others in my wife’s family who still live nearby. (I have one cousin who spends his summers there and moves to his Florida home when the temperature and leaves drop. This was November, so he wasn’t around.) Early one Wednesday (or Thursday?) afternoon, I took advantage of our relaxed schedule, climbed into the van, and drove to the cemetery. I didn’t expect to find anyone else there and wasn’t disappointed.

I pulled around the curved driveway, built for the hearses and parade of cars filled with mourners that no longer come to a dead cemetery. It was neat and tidy. The flat gravestones and absence of any plantings other than grass make mowing simple. Perpetual care for the residents isn’t costing the congregation’s cemetery trust fund much.

I spent some time wandering around the plots. I saw a few of my parents’ friends and a few of my friends’ parents. I recognized the names of many in the congregation I knew as a kid -- older men whose bald heads I would stare at and older women whose perfume I could smell from several pews away. Other names were familiar in a different way. They were the temple’s founding members who passed away before I was alive but whose support for the congregation was commemorated on the beautiful stained-glass windows in the sanctuary. I used to study those windows in boredom. Each depicted the 12 tribes of Israel – the Lion of Judah, the Grapes of Dan. (Or was that Asher? Or Gad?)

I found my parents’ site along the eastern edge of the graveyard. Unremarkable other than the flag denoting dad’s Army service during World War II. The plaque on mom’s gravestone, unveiled in September 2015 about nine months after her death, did seem shinier than the others. As I drifted back toward the van, my eye shifted from the names on the stones to the dates. Very few marked the graves of anyone who had passed away after dad did in December 2004. Only two – one of my parents’ dearest friends and a lady I recognized as a distant relative – had moved in since mom’s funeral five years ago.


That’s when I realized this is a dead cemetery. To paraphrase the awful old pun, no one is dying to get in here anymore.

The contrast between my hometown and my current address is striking. I live now in one of the fastest growing cities in the country. Nearly 900 people move here every week – really more, because that number is net of people who leave. It’s a million-plus metropolis whose crane-studded skyline is under constant transformation.

Where I grew up was never a boomtown, but it once had a solid manufacturing base; it housed its share of the string of smokestacks that followed the Ohio, Beaver, and Shenango rivers north out of Pittsburgh. Today, it’s a Rust Belt poster child. Most of the downtown buildings that haven’t been torn down are condemned or boarded up or replaced by Dollar Trees. Near the city center, a corner that used to house a busy drug store now has an odd micro-park featuring graffitied signs claiming, “Progress is Visible.” (Really? I didn’t see any.)

The population peaked at almost 49,000 in 1950 – six years before I was born. It’s less than half that today – almost all of them gentile.

The town never had a large Jewish community, but enough for our temple and another – larger and more conservative – congregation. They included many shopkeepers and professionals. It was my generation that left; we went off to college and never came home. Many of us moved far away. Few new families moved there. The exodus forced the two congregations first to merge then to close altogether. The only ones left from our temple family are a few of the younger members of my parents’ cohort. I know of only one person my age who came back home.

Even my parents left – for a while. They bought a home in South Florida and spent all of dad’s final years and most of mom’s there. They had purchased their plots long ago, though, so both made one last trip home, resting comfortably in their caskets, en route to the nearly dead cemetery.


The demise of the Jewish community back home isn’t a unique occurrence – or a new one. Small towns in rural America have been shrinking and dying off since the turn of the last century. Mass migrations south and west have meant the same fate for the old industrial centers of the north and east. And as the cities emptied out, so did communities within them – the neighborhoods, congregations, and social clubs. Just as the smallest towns were most at risk, so were the smallest communities. They leave behind only husks, or memories, or cemeteries. The Rust Belt is home to plenty of dead cemeteries.

On one of my last days up home, I drove down a street where many of the city’s once-grand old houses still stand under larger oak canopies. They once were home to the area captains of industry. Some are now occupied by non-profit groups that keep them looking at least presentable. A few, though, are sad relics. Walls and roofs are caving in. The once majestic yards overgrown with weeds. Windows gone or broken.

Those houses are not just dead; they’re abandoned. No one wants them anymore. I suspect they’ll eventually be razed and turned into parking lots that are never used – just like what happened to many of the buildings a few blocks away in the faded downtown.

These barely standing old mansions sit as reminders of what happened to the little city – the plants and mills left, jobs left, shops left, those of us lucky enough to move away left. What’s left is a hollow remnant of what once was, a town no one wants anymore.

Now that, is sad. So much sadder than my dead cemetery.



Monday, August 3, 2020

Eulogy For a Great Man

“Great” – like “quality” – is a tough word to pin down. We think we know greatness when we see it, but frequently struggle to explain our rationale. A friend of mine passed away last week after a two-plus-year fight against an insidious brain tumor. 

Although he had his flaws, Lou Goodman was a great man. 

There. I said it. Now here’s where I explain, mostly to myself, why I think so.

What is “great”? It’s related to “good,” but not part of the good-better-best triad. It has no natural antonym, like “bad” is to “good.” Merriam-Webster has 11 definitions for “great” as an adjective; it means everything from “large in size” to a more-distant relative. As for what qualities make a person great, three of those definitions stand out:

  • Eminent or distinguished;
  • Markedly superior in character or quality; and
  • Remarkably skilled.

So many parts of Lou’s professional career match up with those three standards of greatness. As the CEO of the Texas Medical Association for 22 years, Lou was “eminent and distinguished” – he stood out – among his peers around the nation. The more experienced among them quickly recognized Lou’s talents and gladly let him lead. The newcomers forged his alliance. A generation of health care leaders sought his wisdom, trusted his counsel, and followed his example. The physicians whom he so greatly admired and for whom he toiled so mightily in turn held Lou in the highest esteem.

Though Lou was known to use bluff and bluster to his advantage, he had a lot of there there. No doubt about his “markedly superior qualities.” Lou was very smart (he earned A-plusses, not just As, in graduate school), a quick study on the complex issues medicine faces. He demanded solid analytics because that’s how he earned his PhD and then built his career. He respected those of a similar ilk. He saw right through lightweights and blowhards. Lou wouldn’t suffer a fool, and many a fool suffered his disdain.

When it comes to “remarkable skills,” I believe each of us has at least a bit of greatness within. It may seem insignificant. My mom, for some reason, always prided herself on how well she folded hospital corners in a bed sheet. Others’ great skills may be more easily quantified and recognized, even if limited in scope – hitting a baseball, blowing a horn, writing elegant code, discerning a muffled heart murmur. 

But it’s the breadth, the sheer area, of competencies in which someone is “remarkably skilled” that makes us brand a woman or a man as great. Such was Lou Goodman.

Lou was a great leader. The volume of books and research on leadership testifies to the expanse of skills the best leaders must master: personality, strategy, attitude, fortitude, confidence, humility, patience, vision.

I’ve seen Lou expertly ride the often choppy waves of each of those character traits ... except humility. I’ll leave it to his family and closer friends to disclose if Lou was humble in private. He certainly was a proud man – the opposite of humble – but I’d argue that pride fueled his drive for success. Not only did he hate to lose; he hated to be seen as a loser. Even absent humility, he was still a great leader. None of us – even the pantheon of bests like Lincoln and Churchill that Lou so admired – is perfect.

Lou made few mistakes, and his pride made him loath to admit them. I heard him acknowledge one or two, punctuated with the advice/warning, “Don’t ever make the same mistake twice.”

Lou could read people amazingly quickly – and usually quite accurately. He could tell friend from foe, genuine from poser, clean from dirty, valuable from timewaster, trustworthy from dodgy. This skill fed Lou’s ultimate strength: he was a master at forging long-lasting, tight relationships. So many of his friends were besties. So many associates were confidants.

At the ceremony last year to rename the TMA building after Lou, a U.S. congressman and a state senator were the keynote speakers, earnestly laying on the praise. Between them, they had more than 40 years of public service. They were close enough that Lou could call them any day for advice, and they were close enough that they frequently called him for advice.

Lou didn’t ask for favors; he convinced you it was in your best interest to do what he wanted. And then he returned the help. It was cement. Neither felt put out. Each anticipated the next opportunity to help.

If you don’t know about TMA, it’s the state professional organization that represents more than 53,000 Texas physicians and medical students. Been around since 1853. Lou regularly reminded us, “this is the doctors’ organization. They are the ranchers, we’re the ranch hands.” This simultaneously empowered and protected Lou and the people like me who worked for him. The physicians set the policy objectives, but we were trusted to use our own ideas and skills to get us there. It made TMA a great place to work, enabled Lou to hire some absolutely outstanding men and women, and kept many of them working for the doctors for 20, 25, 30 years or more. He loved to put his best staff on the spot, knowing they’d perform well, giving them a chance to shine in front of others.

Lou enjoyed a good argument, especially one-on-one, across the desk or standing in a quiet corner. Extra points for $5 words and historical references. He gave staff the latitude to disagree with him, to make our case, to use the expertise that he knew we had and he didn’t. (That’s why he hired us.) They weren’t always resolved right away. Some went on for months, with frequent jibes and other reminders of the unsettled business. On most questions of any import, one of us would end up agreeing with the other, or we’d devise an even better solution together. “You do know who signs your paycheck, don’t you?” was usually bluster – but a not-so-subtle reminder. Very, very rarely did Lou play his “because I’m the boss” card.

And Lou Goodman was a good man. Maybe not a boy scout – he could be stubborn and he had his prejudices – but he was honest and kind, sincere, a loyal friend. Several times I recall we undertook the tedious process of evaluating each of TMA’s numerous programs and projects and services, looking to trim those that were no longer needed. When it came down to it, though, Lou couldn’t pull the trigger. “Programs are people,” he’d say.

It’s been odd these past two years as we saw less and less of Lou, as we had less and less of him. And now he’s gone. But not. I hear so many of my colleagues speak a Lou-ism or lay out a Lou-like plan or tackle adversity with Lou-ish gusto and determination. 

We have a new boss now. He inherited an excellent team. And amid the unexpected challenges of COVID-19, he led us and motivated us to be everything that Lou saw in us, to give everything that Lou trained us to give.

And, so, the final defining trait of a great person – a legacy. Check.

Lou Goodman was a great man. Per that Texan-ism that Jersey Lou adopted, “It ain’t braggin’ if it’s true.”